ABSTRACT
In this work, we study the feeling of membership in undergraduate students who interact with their higher education institution through a virtual environment. We explore the Centro de Investigaciones en Diseño Industrial (CIDI) case, in which a virtual environment was built using the Roblox platform to enhance the online experience that students were having during the COVID-19 pandemic. Through the application of the Psychological Sense of School Membership scale, we show that it is possible to evoke a sense of belonging in a physical space with a virtual representation. We achieved this by virtually replicating the physicality of the original CIDI and by promoting social behaviors using three modalities of social interaction. © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
ABSTRACT
Victimization via cyberbullying has become a significant mental health concern particularly among adolescents at risk of depression and other mental health issues. As the COVID-19 outbreak forced everyone to stay at home and participate in their educational, recreational, and entertainment activities online, this study investigated the relation between cyberbullying victimization and depressive symptoms among 612 college students in Tamilnadu, India. We hypothesized that experiences of cyberbullying victimization would predict depressive symptoms among the participants. Adolescents aged 18 to 19 from colleges in Tamilnadu completed an online survey composed of the Cybervictimization Questionnaire for Adolescents (CYVIC) and the Beck's Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Results showed a significant positive relation between cyberbullying victimization and depression (r = 0.80, p < .001). Regression analysis revealed that cyberbullying victimization is a statistically significant predictor of depressive symptoms (r2 = 0.65). Likewise, impersonation (r = 0.70), written-verbal cyber victimization (r = 0.73), visual teasing/happy slapping (r = 0.69), and online exclusion (r = 0.67) contributed to the significant positive association between the variables. These findings can serve as a foundation for intervention programs to alleviate depressive symptoms by addressing cyberbullying experiences and conducting further research on the negative effects of cyberbullying victimization among adolescents.
ABSTRACT
Background: In 2014, Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) in Tampa, Florida launched a lung cancer screening program for high-risk individuals meeting USPSTF inclusion criteria. To reveal successes and potential limitations of this program, we conducted a survey to measure lung cancer screening patient experiences and satisfaction. Methods: In August 2020, a survey was mailed to 576 patients who completed one or more lung cancer screenings at MCC. The survey collected demographics and smoking history and measured patient satisfaction and experiences in 6 domains: the appointment process, clinical staff interactions, communication, visit with the provider, screening results and cost, and the clinic facility/overall satisfaction. There were also questions on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. A 5-point Likert scale was used to measure satisfaction with clinical staff and clinic facility/overall satisfaction (1= excellent to 5= poor) and other domains (1=strongly agree to 5=strongly disagree). Results were quantified using descriptive statistics. Results: Among the 160 patients that completed the survey, 96.3% were White, 93.1% were non-Hispanic, 46.9% were female, 78.1% were former smokers, and the mean age was 69 years. For the appointment process, 91.2% "strongly agreed/agreed" it was easy to make an appointment and 92.5% "strongly agreed/agreed" the clinic check-in process was efficient. Next, nearly 93% reported the courtesy of the clinical staff was "excellent/very good". For communication, while 90% "strongly agreed/agreed" that the lung cancer screening process was clearly explained, 63.2% "strongly agreed/agreed" that the potential harms and limitations were clearly explained and 71.2% "strongly agreed/agreed" that the process for follow-up screening was clearly explained. For the provider questions, 71.3% "strongly agreed/agreed" that the provider was willing to listen carefully and 66.3% "strongly agreed/agreed" that the instructions regarding follow-up were easy to understand. For results and costs, 79.4% "strongly agreed/agreed" the screening results were clearly explained and 70% "strongly agreed/agreed" that the cost of the screening was justified. Regarding overall satisfaction, 87.6% "strongly agreed/agreed" they would recommend lung cancer screening at MCC. Finally, 10.6% of patients were concerned about getting a lung cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic and only 8.1% reported that the COVID-19 pandemic prevented them from getting a lung cancer screening. Conclusion: Generally, for all 6 domains, patients reported favorable satisfaction and experience with lung cancer screening at MCC. However, higher rates of "neither agree/disagree" and "prefer not to answer" were observed for items related to communication and visit with the provider items suggesting improvements may be warranted, particularly related to future visits.